How will we know what the reality is, what the truth is regarding “signatures” of our interactions? Surely the proximity of our persons has something to do with it on a certain layer of reality. Yet the actual signatures are intentional actions, and I hypothesize the signatures that “count” are in the sexualized culture / layer of reality. We must ask if these signatures are done in one’s full awareness and free will.
I prefer not to participate in such a culture and I surely never have in my awareness or knowing consent.
We ask: does the chicken or egg come first? In what layer of our persons, if any at all, does free will exist, and how do we communicate our self interest to every layer of the “self” even amongst cultural differences (so we are in “synergy”)?
The experiment has failed because the subject is aware of the experiment, therefore voiding it’s results, yet there seems to be much undoing that still needs to occur.
There seems to be a few barriers between “realms” / “layers of reality”:
-Communication between timescales. What is the “time ratio” at in our modern day and how do we track it? For example: one breath to ten years. We must also ask if Moore’s Law regarding time technologies (megascale centrifuges, gravity harnessing satellites) has reached it’s apex and are we at a nanosecond to infinite, etc…?
-Cultural / educational / definitions of words, concepts, etc… I define a binder with a paperclip a certain way according to my education; is my entire person in “synergy” with how we define such an inert object.
-Technological (optical lenses, audio devices): Example: I cannot see or hear you because I have A.R. (augmented reality) lenses on my eyes and selective A.R. audio devices in my ears. Example: I am looking at a motorcycle, what is every interpretation and manifestation of such an event, specifically across relevant cultures, etc… Is it a good idea to have a public database of C.V. (computer vision) recognized objects and their interpretations across relevant cultures?
I am watching sports that my computer vision nanocameras recognize, what are the rest of the “layers of my person” watching or how are they reacting? What propels that reaction and is free will intact? How is such information processed? Whom is responsible for such technologies and what are their underlying ideologies?
Certain applications of these technologies have much potential as allies in communications between timescales and cultures, yet the first order of business is to get wrongs to cease (regarding these technologies).
-Clairvoyance thought broadcasts
-Technological – Lenses and audio devices obviously have much potential for non-violating beneficial usage yet why do purveyors of atrocious have access to this advanced technology?
Leave a Reply