Macken Design Co.

Some fiction and tears and laughz

Category: Education

  • Maps of the Mind and the Distributed Person

    Let us create an experiment to help us understand some (possible) phenomenas of our modern day.

    First, all participants must wear tracking devices, cameras, optical lenses and audio devices harnessing deep fake, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence technologies.

    Ethics is priority in our experiment, so everything about our experiment, because it involves living beings, has to be forthright, honest, blatantly disclosed, and everyone will know they are participating and will have given permission and consent to participate. Furthermore, any and all participants, at any time, and for any reason can “opt out” of the experiment for any reason (or no reason at all). They can have their lenses and audio devices and sensors removed just because they say so, no reason will even be needed to prompt their exit.

    We shall monitor the brains of our users / players to a highly precise degree. We shall track each and every thought and experience and interaction.

    Second, what is our (architects of this “game”) underlying ideologies? What is the purpose of the game? It is to make to world a happier, healthier, lighter place.

    We shall customize the experience to the user / participant.

    There is a Jewish participant, this Jew has studied and knows the Torah. In the Torah, there are the different characters: Abraham, Sarai, Deborah, Jacob, Esau, Moses, Lot, the Prodigal Son, etc… The Jew knows that attacking a nice old lady for no reason is bad. These are the different “houses”.

    There is an Atheist. This atheist knows social manners. This atheist is an expert at manners. The Atheist remembers, as a child, when his classmate John punched Jim, that John behaved badly. He remembers that using a spoon for your salad (out of the two forks) is ABSURD, and bad manners. The Atheist knows that attacking a nice old lady for no reason is bad. Let these be the houses for the atheist.

    There is a Muslim. The Muslim knows that the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) is of the good house, and Iblis is bad. The Muslim knows that attacking a nice old lady for no reason is bad. Let these be houses of this Muslim.

    Throughout their experience in this game, the players interact with each other.

    Reduce each “house” (and each interaction) to “good” or “bad”.

    We shall quantify the good and the bad. (Even though we know there is goodness in all people).

    The “attention economy”: “that was good”, :good”, “good”, “good!”, “good”. A universal, unanimous, hands down, absolute “GOOD” is decided by the entire world! With the “attention economy”, we shall quantify where the attention of each player goes to. The visual attention shall be quantified through a computer vision recognition of the activity, person, through their nanoscale camera they have implanted in their eyes. Everything they look at, listen to, shall be accounted for. We shall assign “owners” of the attention activity. Credit shall go to them for the attention that is “paid”. Every “idea” shall have a source and that source shall be the owner. We will go back, very far, to find the source and core of every idea, thought, concept, in existence. Then relevant credibility will be given to the right person for those that pay attention to them.

    Our statistics from the data we gather shall be vast.

    On this Earth, there are a lot of people. The spectrum of behavior, and our cultures, amongst all of the people in the world are very broad and diverse.

    It looks like some separation is called for. The culture of group A from group B requires the separation, else they will kill each other (need I remind you about when our lenses were removed in Project: Birdbox?)

    Layers of reality. Let us quantify and connect each person to another person, even amongst the separation of cultural groupings.

    Empowerment of the feet: The lowest segment of our physical persons, our feet, were designated (after the Great Internal Affairs Battle of Odin’s Third Cousin Rufio versus Captain Hook) a permanent layer of reality in our game that is meant to empower those actors. It is a difficult layer of reality to survive and thrive in because it is so primal, unless you are highly sexually attractive. It is the sexual layer of reality. Only very few people in this world are able to thrive in the sexualized layer of reality. Just imagine what a porn star goes through, what it takes to be a porn star. The primal nature of being that, and the “battles” involved. (Most people do not want to, or cannot, participate in this culture / economy).

    So on the playing field, we have four layers of a total of eight “distributed persons”. The “distributed person” is or can be something somewhat like a “hive mind”. An interconnected person: Jim on layer four just ingested soy sauce, Jim on layer three just kissed an exhaust pipe!?, Jim on layer one was jumping on the couch with his shoes on, Jim on layer two just did something that complimented a deficit or balanced out the soy sauce ingestion. Was Jim on layer four the chicken or the egg? Which went first?

    And, at this point, the question of who went first may be irrelevant? Why because (some) of the technologies that are involved and that connect us (and our layer of distributed person) are certainly clairvoyance thought broadcasts, but all nano gasses that affect our decision, and the combination of such technologies affecting our free will.

    There is logic involved, but fighting over who is the rightful “owner” for certain things may be a redundant argument.

    The mobile, impermanence of all of these ideas. We can update and maneuver all of these concepts at will, as we, the architects see fit, so nothing is set in stone. We shall adjust this game as needed, at ours or your will, wish, or want.

    Whom has the right to enter thy feet’s holy grail? They fought for it, killed for it, but it wasn’t theirs and never will be. Feet up… News briefing: “The Body Layer of Reality found a new disease!” “It looks like Diablo House is really dominating on layer 4” “But that is a wrong and Diablo House shouldn’t be doing that.” “That is what that house does, and there will be consequences to those actions.”

    Gone wrong – Where we may be at – Let us begin our session (the Battle of the Generals):

    The drunken fat general under foreign influence: “It says right here, right here in the fine print. LOOK at the non-disclosure agreement of our illegal contract sir, our highest flying sinless white purity supreme Minister Rabbi Priest has the RIGHT to commit that rape. His hair is lighter than yours, you must admit. You have sinned and your testicles (life), ribs, and anus are HIS birthrights, SIR! If you have a problem with it, genetically we can change your sexuality to homosexual and your body to female… if you want to contend… You agreed, SIR! and we rolled out our foreign ideology on U.S. soil. No going back!”

    On the contraire sir: “Rape is equitable to unjustified homicide. If you could do anything in the world and get away with it? Would you do such a thing?”

    “Babe, bimbo, can you please get some more signatures and take more of their souls in our possession? Gud job bimbo babe. Luv u.”

    The crowd roars! NO ONE CAN RESIST THE BIMBO!

    *Dark, unfortunately relevant humor.

    https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1

    Our most relevant ethical discussion: An extremely lucrative, programmed in and rolled out “Game theory” outside of our freewill. Ready, let’s all FIGHT!

  • “What’s Good For Us Is Good For Them”

    So what do we know? Well, it depends.

    Have you ever read Plato’s Allegory Of The Cave?

    It is a story about miseducation. In the battle of nature versus nurture, nurture (which is education) can certainly almost always win if concentrated. While nature always occurs, nurture can always win over the individual. It is called “conditioning”. But nurture is not always the winner, it depends on what is being taught.

    This may be something like Kendrick Lamar’s “T.V. Off“. Let’s say the prisoners in the cave, first off do not understand or have a moral compass. Well there is a stream of video broadcast to the learners. It broadcasts all kinds of very bad and wrongful material. Sexual, immorality, disgusting, and heinous acts of wrong. The learners learn all of this material. That is what they know. TURN OFF HIS CELLPHONE PLEASE, FOR GOODNESS SAKE! 

    Every time he looked at his screen it would play. He couldn't see it (and no one else in his "layer of reality" saw it) but the people behind his nano cameras saw it. They lined up his interactions with the phone. Every single button click, every single scroll.

    So that is what they know, yet I argue that morality, to a certain degree, is natural. Even those conditioned to not have empathy do know, somewhere within themselves, when something is not right if something hurts or violates someone – that that is a wrong.

    So in a sense, these people who have been miseducated are more than likely to be propagators of atrocious over other people who have an intact moral compass. But they are like chickens with their heads cut off! They don’t know what they are doing that it is bad and they are the bad people if they act on such learned material!

    So what can we do with them?

    If someone commits a wrongful action on you, it is only natural to want some kind of justice. If these people are miseducated and know not what they do, who do we blame? They are just like miseducated kids.

    The actors who perpetrate wrongs are responsible for their actions, no one else can be, even though the root of the problem is the educators.

    Let’s look at another scenario: say someone who is competent and sane and has her moral compass intact looks at disease all day. This person studies and studies and learns about disease all day, every day! While this person is unaware, an experiment is occurring. The “stream” of disease that this person is watching and learning is being broadcast to those in caves like the Allegory of the Cave. The people in the cave have no moral compass and all they get to know is the disease. There is a major difference between the person with a moral compass and the cave dwellers. The cave dwellers, once released from their caves, the cave dwellers now ARE the disease! Whereas the competent studier of disease becomes a Maestro Doctor whom knows the disease is bad.

    Okay doctaz, yer slow… it’s okay, we understand… we’ve all been “hit” by this foreign culture that is hard to even “put a finger on”. Well, let me give you a hint to solve all of the problems of the world. The competent person with her moral compass intact was looking at porn that was the disease (as defined by a purveyors of an anti-porn religious ideology?).

    Who is in the cave? Who knows? But it has something to do with our thoughts, our actions, our choices, our DNA, our history of living, our property, ectera AND TIME (Einstein’s Theory of Relativity – What does your person emit in one breath that the aforementioned lives out for an entire year!?)

    Surely the doctor studying the disease cannot be blamed for the disease. It is the system that directs the disease material to the cave dwellers that is responsible!

    So what is good for us is good for them. (Yea because they are people, like you and I…)

    But the difference is that we know the difference of right and wrong and they, the cave dwellers don’t. Everything else is the same between us. In or through a certain lens, we can say that we are the same “person”.

    That is our common ground (probably amongst other similarities). All peoples (no matter how classified or labelled) deserve basic human rights. PERIOD. And we need to strive to achieve this feat, globally, “inter-dimensionally”.

    FOR ALL PEOPLES: Real food, real water, real shelter, real sleep, real clothing, real sex (and the right to individual preferences and abstinence), hygiene, the right to social belonging and acceptance within our peer and family groups, the right to psychological safety and real physical safety.

    Individual preferences are to be honored IRREFUTABLY regarding sex. We can achieve this through a matchmaking effort.

    We have to start there. That is priority number one.

    Let me say once more what our priority number one is for all of humanity:

    FOR ALL PEOPLES (no matter how one or two or neander-minotaur is classified as): Real food, real water, real shelter, real sleep, real clothing, real sex (and the right to individual preferences and abstinence), hygiene, the right to social belonging and acceptance within our peer and family groups, the right to psychological safety and real physical safety.

  • #you

  • Who are you interacting with?

    We have to consider much ethics regarding this system of deep fake, augmented reality, artificial intelligence “personalities” / “masks” system.

    What are the real issues to address? Competing for limitations of resources? Over population from time technologies?

    Ethical compliance is that the “end users” and all participants shall only use this technology (optical lenses, audio devices, and sensory devices that harness deep fake, augmented reality, artificial intelligence) with HONEST, FULL, BLATANT, COMPREHENSIVE disclosure and consent. The user and participant shall have access to individualized and personalized “settings” in which the experience can be customized. (Example: “I would like to know my location, I would like all deep fake masks turned off, I want to opt out for 24 hours) The user shall be able to opt out of the use of such technology at any time and for any reason.

    There needs to be a neutral and unbiased governing body ensuring no atrocities occur. The governing body needs to also hold a high priority to make sure people’s basic needs are met (all participants and all involved) without discrimination: Real food, real water, real sleep, real shelter, real sex (and the right to abstinence and individual preference), real hygiene, the right to social belonging and acceptance of individuality within the peer and family group, the right to safety – psychological and physical.

  • African Masai Tribal Technique: Ethical Response To Child Misbehavior and Unacceptable Behavioral Deviations

    Author: Sean Macken

    Date: 1/30/24

    This may be a worthwhile technique to (first of all – accurately preserve) study and/or duplicate as an ethical technique to handle child / kid misbehavior / unacceptable behavioral deviations.

    When a child does a wrong action, or misbehaves, the tribe, as one collective entity, embraces the child with love, with feelings of belonging, and acceptance.

    Through such a ritual, the tribal bond is built so strong and of perceived importance, that the individual will make choices (out of his/her/it’s/they/them/his/her/its personal freewill) that continue to strengthen the tribe’s homogeneity and, thus, reinforcement of socially acceptable behavior and norms.

    Tupac – Unconditional Love

    Links: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/02/17/the-masai-model/07a7c861-17b7-4e03-be4f-c2a79cee043a/

    https://www.masaimara.com/maasai-people.php#:~:text=According%20to%20Maasai%20history%20the,the%20Tanga%20Coast%20in%20Tanzania.

    https://www.masaimara.travel/maasai-tribe-facts.php

    http://maasaiwilderness.org/maasai/

  • Bnei Manashe, Nagas, and the N word.

    “Nagas” refer to divine or semi-divine, half-human, half-serpent beings found in Eastern mythologies, particularly Hinduism and Buddhism, who are guardians of treasure and reside in the netherworld called Patala. The term can also refer to a group of Tibeto-Burman peoples, a Tibeto-Burman language, or a Hindu mendicant of a specific sect.

    Nagas in Mythology

    • Appearance: They are depicted as human-snake hybrids, living beings with serpentine lower bodies, or as entire serpents, sometimes with human heads or a many-hooded cobra canopy over their heads.
    • Role: They are powerful, often benevolent, protectors of hidden treasures and magical knowledge, living in an enchanted underworld.
    • Cultural Significance: They hold significant cultural importance in many South Asian and Southeast Asian cultures and have been revered in rituals for thousands of years.
    • Key Figures: Important figures include Shesha, the divine couch of Lord Vishnu, and Nagaraja Vasuki, who served as a rope in the churning of the Ocean of Milk.

    Other Meanings of “Naga”

    • Ethnic Group: “Naga” also refers to a group of Tibeto-Burman peoples living in the Naga hills of India and parts of Burma.
    • Languages: It is also the name for a family of Tibeto-Burman languages spoken by these peoples.
    • Hindu Mendicants: In India, a “Naga” can also be a member of various Hindu sects who are mendicants, or ascetics.

    Cultural Connections

    • India: Many cities in Kashmir, such as Anantnag and Verinag, have names with the “Naga” suffix, indicating the historical presence and influence of Naga culture.
    • Southeast Asia: Dynasties in places like Manipur, India, and the ancient kingdom of Funan in Indochina claimed their origins from unions with nagas or their female counterparts, the naginis.

    The Bnei Menashe and the lost tribes of Israel

    The strongest claim to biblical descent in the broader region comes from the Bnei Menashe, a community on the India-Burma border with roots in Tibeto-Burmese ethnic groups.

    • Lost tribe of Menasseh: The Bnei Menashe are a community of about 10,000 members from the Chin, Kuki, and Mizo ethnic groups, among others, who claim descent from one of the Lost Tribes of Israel. The movement originated from a tribal leader’s dream in 1951.
    • Ancestral claims: The claim is reportedly based on local traditions about an ancestor named Manmasi or Manasia, interpreted as a connection to the biblical Manasseh, son of Joseph. Some members have embraced Judaism, with Israeli rabbis having visited the community.
    • Not a Tibetan or Burmese claim: It is important to note that this is a specific claim from a community that lives on the borderlands, not a belief common to the Tibetan or Burmese populations as a whole.

    My hypotheses on Nagas and the N Word

  • I encourage you to be legitimate and honest.

    Here is some of my theory of what crime is. Crime = eye for an eye.

    crime 101Download