A friend once (spontaneously) blurted out one day about how it is who you are around. You are who you are around, perhaps? It stuck with me. There is some significance, in this system, with whom you are in proximity to. With this system that has been interacting with me, I feel there is much relevance. I hypothesize that this may have something to what I deem as foreign ideology, the ideology of separatism. In Germany, for example, they have separate “zones” for the criminals versus a zone for residential versus a zone for business entities. I imagine crossing over from the criminal zone to the business zone is something of an ordeal. This ideology, I argue, is in conflict with American ideology (our melting pot), where we hold to a high regard such things as diversity. I hypothesize that the zones are “mobile” and moveable.
Once I was at work and a strange phenomena occurred. It seemed like my boss and his cosort were, with their voices “testing” from me what parts of their conversation “got on the map / radar”. Ten feet away: “Can you hear me now?” Fifty feet away: “Can you hear me now?” One hundred feet away: “Can you hear me now?” Two hundred feet away: “Can you hear me now?” etcetera. This was an interaction with some data system. “Good. Two hundred feet away and we aren’t on his ‘radar’”.
How, exactly, are we connected – if at all? Who, what, when, where, why, and how?
What information is public? What personal information crosses into the public? Legitimately and illegitimately?
The juicy bits and interesting stuff, for someone, has to be that we (or I) don’t actually know who we are around, literally because of matter teleportation and other technology. I know I, certainly, have non-consensually implanted optical lenses in my eyes that are probably near nano-scale in size… do you have these same implants? (Are you sure about that!?) When I perceive myself to be talking to people I love and know, whose “personalities” have been illegally scanned, I really have no idea whom I actually am talking to. I hypothesize there is a certain logic, such as a genetic reasoning. That person he is talking to is quantified as his DNA gene that responds well to, and prefers tea over coffee, mustard over catsup.
What about that homeless person talking to no one that perceives himself to be talking to a friend or loved one? (That person he is talking to, Major Marshall, was murdered sixty years ago!? What The Funk!?). Perhaps those imaginary people are “copies” of dead people? (A.I. Personalities). Let me manufacture a customized pharmaceutical just for him… just take it once a day and he won’t see his friendly digital a.i. personalities anymore. $$$Cha-ching$$$! (You are sick because I say you are sick, and you need to take the pharmaceuticals I produce because I simply want my agents to be in your system. It’ll make the bad artificial intelligence “personalities” disappear **click on a mouse button, click click, see… all better, all gone**.) The medical and pharmaceutical and their supporting systems is where some of the foreign ideology “got in”, too. (There seems to have have been many such ideological battles within medical ideology “Don’t try to fix what isn’t broken.”). *This medical and selfish corruption is wrong and an injustice, and consumers as well as medical professionals should be aware of the reality of how it works. This is one reason to always read the Patient’s Rights that are posted in medical facilities.
I, with my non-consensually implanted optical lenses once saw a doppelgänger of Kanye West on the streets. He had a hoodie on and I imagined his life was like a tragedy like The Soloist. I had thoughts about how this person, Kanye’s doppelgänger or A.I. personality got tortured. A very sad story, he, the actual person may have suffered while being very alone. I ask if there is any truth to my “insight”? I such unfortunate phenomena may be what propels people (perhaps usually one’s doppelgänger) into the limelight, stardom, or celebrity-hood. I ask again, in all seriousness, is there or has there been a doppelgänger of Kanye West who was homeless and who was tortured? If so, how do we find and achieve justice for this man and let his soul rest?
I hear a low hum of vehicles in the distance traveling on the road.
What I realized is that there is much going on at the nearest major intersection, at the nearest store, at the nearest house, that has some connection to the subject at hand (all of us). It is a certain “layer of reality” and “different culture” that we have been discussing. I care not to convince anyone of my findings, but I believe in our quantumly entangled world, that that is the truth. Proximity matters, whom you are around, and it is beyond just your immediate private environment.
This system that I speak of does infringe on our privacy though. It has awareness of our private property and our most intimate moments.
We have our differing cultures separated by technological layers of reality (and time).
Public vs. Private
I once heard everything on the internet was deemed public, there was a brief argument somewhere. I’d be interested in knowing the limitations to that: what about secured systems connected to the internet? What about logging into a “private” system such as any account?
Surely that private civilian citizen’s home is private – no need to post a sign, we all assume and know so. Any entity spying on them is essentially committing a crime unless it is legitimate, blatant, forthright; aka with a legitimate warrant. (I just got a whif of an entry point into a lot of corruption… ewww let’s all stay away from there, that area, I’m sure, gets nasty…).
That park we know is public. That government facility we know is sort of private to the government. Yet despite the controlled nature of a government facility or an area designated for the public, the people still retain their rights to security of person and privacy (government facilities, I’d imagine come with it lessened personal privacy).
I argue that even private government facilities should adhere and hold to a high regard our American ideals (such as our Constitutional Rights). So in the U.S.A., diversity is of utmost importance. If there are government agencies or branches going against such things, that is foreign influence. A government for and by the people, the Constitution, our preference for diversity.
Public vs. Private on a whole new level. We mist discuss this and the findings of what the truth is must be blatant and accessible to the public. We need to be intelligent and civil people, or fall victim to those foreign ideologies taking advantage. Electronics, wireless, thought broadcasts; I have heard that anything in the air, and I am not sure if this is true or not,is public. For example: soundwaves, the vibrations of sound, what someone says, or vocalizes is public, anywhere, at any time is technically public. Wireless radio signals are public. Cellular and microwave included (wifi and cellular phones). Is this true? What are the limits? Surely, me, a private civilian citizen cannot go and reach into the airwaves and grab my neighbor’s private conversations! Surely, it would be wrong (and illegal) for me to photograph my neighbor unknowingly! Knowing that is sanity and a functioning moral compass. If I could get away with doing that, I WOULDN’T!
We are at the age of extremes. So I feel some people may not know what they do and how much of an infringement it is on people.
What is wrong is still wrong, what is illegal is still illegal whether in the private or public is my argument.
Essentially, civil law is: a diversified group (representatives of society) of people come together to say: that is wrong, that is okay or not okay in our community / society / city / nation, etcetera. So let us (the public) be aware of what the technologies that have been rolled out and are in use so we can make educated decisions. Who is the shepherd around here!? I’d prefer my sheep to be smart, well educated, fully aware, and healthy.
It is a lose-lose scenario. The same friend said from that perspective, everyone is addicted to something. It is an extreme infringement on our privacy and persons for this entity to even know such an intimate detail. Addicted to talking to friends? Addicted to walking the dog? Addicted to riding a bike? From this perspective everyone needs to be treated for something, we all lose. It seems to be a “stalker dynamic”, this “system” and us. How do we “opt out” of their interaction with us?
What’s your opinion?
