Tag: Ontology

  • Non-Violence, Achieving Needs For All, Non-violations – Semantic and Ontological Manifestations and Interpretation Between Timescales

    Date: 9/19/25

    First Draft

    Manifesting Non-violence, Non-lethality, and Non-violation of Persons

    Summary: 

    As time differences of timescales according to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity manifest, our layers of “person” become distributed to people outside of ourselves in differing timescales of reality. When wrongs occur, to eliminate further wrongs, as a ripple wave, of something that occurs in one timescale to another timescale and reality, we can interpret and reinterpret that wrongful action harnessing semantic and ontological technologies. Doing so is worth the effort and will avoid many wrongful actions. 

    Definitions: 

    Wrong: An outcome we would like to avoid.

    Semantic: A semantic definition refers to the meaning of a word, symbol, or sentence, encompassing its interpretation, significance, and how it relates to other meanings or real-world concepts, rather than just its grammatical structure or how it’s used in a specific situation

    Ontological: An ontology serves as a formal system for organizing knowledge, showing the relationships between concepts and categories in a specific domain. 

    Context of Manifestation:

    The context in which interpretation must be filtered through is where all needs (real food, water, shelter, sleep, hygiene, clothing, sex – and individual preferences as well as the right to abstinence) are achieved, and where all rights remain intact (re: Constitutional Rights, Human Rights, etcetera) through the “layer of persons” throughout the different timescales.

    The manifestation and (re)manifestation shall not be limited to just timescale differences, but also to differing visibilities, locations, and spaces.

    We might say that our first goal is for the needs to be met to all peoples, no matter how one is classified. Our second goal is (re)manifesting the violation without violation. 

    Process:

    1. Recognizing a wrong, such as a lethality.
    2. Non-lethal options for reinterpretation and manifestation.
    3. Non-lethal manifestation of the lethality (avoiding a further wrong / lethality).  

    An example of Manifestation:

    An act of violence occurs, the act is acknowledged as a wrong. As the ripple wave of time and space gets set into motion from the wrong, along with it is non-lethal interpretations people have the option to participate in instead of the accurate act of violence.

    An example of a lethal activity interpreted as a non-lethal and non-violation:

    A suicide or homicide interpreted as a haircut. The hair is a part of the actual self and shedding that self via a haircut can be a non-violating lens in which would be worth interpreting and manifesting.